[Geany-devel] geany-plugins depends on GIO - plugin API

[Frank Lanitz]

On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 18:37:37 +0000
Nick Treleaven <nick.treleaven at btinternet.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:56:21 +1100
> Lex Trotman <elextr at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Just structures (ie each pointer in GeanyData), no need to protect
> > individual members because over time structures should be removed from
> > the API because they expose implementation details that are then
> > frozen.  They should use accessors to read/write only the information
> > the plugin needs and new fields should be exposed that way rather than
> > in the structures.
> 
> I haven't been following this thread (subject no longer applies,
> methinks), but I don't really think we should add accessors for
> all fields.

After thinking a bit more about this during weekend, I agree. 

Cheers, 
Frank
-- 
Frank Lanitz <frank at frank.uvena.de>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.geany.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20101120/46b993f0/attachment.pgp>