[Geany-devel] Vala for GeanyObject? (Re: About disabling GTK+/GLib deprecated symbols)
enrico.troeger at xxxxx
Wed Oct 15 16:35:07 UTC 2008
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:03:08 +0100, Nick Treleaven
<nick.treleaven at btinternet.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:32:24 +0200
>Enrico Tröger <enrico.troeger at uvena.de> wrote:
>> >(I really don't like GObject code in C, maybe we could use Vala for
>> I really don't like using anything other than C to write C (except
>> for Glade :D).
>> Seriously, before I state that I don't like Vala, Nick, could you
>> give some details about it?
>> Just an obvious disadvantage: vala would cause another build
>> dependency (for developers, in any case for me :D). But we all
>> have 'glib-genmarshal' already installed.
>Well, I haven't had time to investigate using Vala yet, but:
>* Using Vala for GeanyObject would mean we wouldn't need to touch the
>geanyobject.[hc] files, which are ugly to maintain. It supports
>GObject signals in the language AFAIR.
I don't think these files are ugly to maintain. The GObject system is
pretty straightforward once you got familiar with it.
Yes, it's not "real" OOP but it's ok for C and without it we couldn't
use GTK at all :).
>* Developers would only need to install Vala if they were going to add
>a GeanyObject signal, an uncommon occurrence. The geanyobject.[hc]
>files can stay in SVN.
Yes, I know this but this still affects me at some point :).
I just don't like to install another compiler, learn another language
and use it to generate code we could write by hand (or let generate by
OTOH, if it's easy to use and really has some advantages over
glib-genmarschal, I'm willing to change my opinion :).
Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Devel