[Geany-devel] removing filetype templates

[Frank Lanitz]

On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:30:58 +0100
Enrico Tröger <enrico.troeger at uvena.de> wrote:

> On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:24:02 +0100, Frank Lanitz <frank at frank.uvena.de>
> wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:18:57 +0100
> >Enrico Tröger <enrico.troeger at uvena.de> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:29:27 +0000, Nick Treleaven
> >> <nick.treleaven at btinternet.com> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:50:41 +0000
> >> >eht16 at users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Revision: 3212
> >> >>           http://geany.svn.sourceforge.net/geany/?rev=3212&view=rev
> >> >> Author:   eht16
> >> >> Date:     2008-11-11 19:50:40 +0000 (Tue, 11 Nov 2008)
> >> >> 
> >> >> Log Message:
> >> >> -----------
> >> >> Add a file template for LaTeX (patch by Herbert Voss, thanks).
> >> >
> >> >> TEMPLATES_CREATE_FILE(fname, templates_filetype_html); break; case
> >> >> GEANY_FILETYPES_RUBY:	TEMPLATES_CREATE_FILE(fname,
> >> >> templates_filetype_ruby); break; case GEANY_FILETYPES_PYTHON:
> >> >> TEMPLATES_CREATE_FILE(fname, templates_filetype_python); break;
> >> >> +			case GEANY_FILETYPES_LATEX:
> >> >> TEMPLATES_CREATE_FILE(fname, templates_filetype_latex); break;
> >> >> default: break; }
> >> >>  		TEMPLATES_READ_FILE(fname, &ft_templates[ft_id]);
> >> >
> >> >BTW, I think we could remove filetype templates and just use custom
> >> >file templates instead - they might confuse users into thinking only
> >> >one template per filetype was supported.
> >> >
> >> >When doing this, I think we shouldn't hard code the creation of
> >> >default template files, but install them as data files. The
> >> >advantage would be the user can delete them after installation if
> >> >they want.
> >> 
> >> Yep, sounds good.
> >> The only not so nice effect we will get is that the config dir of
> >> existing users will be cluttered a bit with old template files which
> >> are not used anymore.I'm not sure whether we should just document
> >> this or taking any action to clean it up. But generally I don't like
> >> apps which automatically delete anything in user's configuration
> >> directories.
> >
> >I think this could be combined with the idea moving the config files
> >to .config architecture. by keeping the old .geany as some kind of
> >backup dir. 
> 
> No, IMO these are complete separate tasks and should not be mixed.
> Moving the config dir to $XDG_CONFIG_HOME is unrelated and will happen
> as an opaque action. We won't move only parts or anything.


Keeping .geany was intented for security reasons as e.g. liferea was
doing with version bumps during last years in case something went wrong,
not to use for some future stuff anymore.

Cheers, 
Frank
-- 
Frank Lanitz <frank at frank.uvena.de>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.geany.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20081113/a5c56f63/attachment.pgp>