The content of this repository is AGPL3+ which is fine, but the actual website has a copyright notice on each page, but no license. Maybe it should be one of the CC-BY family?
Yeah, good point. What exact license do you suggest? I think CC-BY-NC-SA or CC-BY-SA fit best.
I don't think NC is needed, as it prevents some fairly useful uses like publishing in a selling magazine (which could quote the website or such, etc.). I don't really care which one it is though, and I welcome any counter arguments, I just mention this because not all "commercial" uses are necessarily harmful.
Agree with @b4n, CC-BY-SA is good.
Like this? https://github.com/geany/www.geany.org/pull/12
Well, I personally would have put the license after the copyright holders
`Contents copyright 2019, the Geany development team, Licensed under CC-BY-SA`
since the license doesn't hold the copyright.
And that brings up the point that it should be `Geany development team and contributors` if the website accepts contributions (like Geany itself after the recent change).
Yeah, I used just "the Geany contributors" as we did in Geany itself.
Closed #6 via #12.
github-comments@lists.geany.org