These files aren't updated (and probably read by anyone) any more and it's better to have less "garbage" files in the root. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/855
-- Commit Summary --
* Concatenate ChangeLog.pre-0-17 and ChangeLog.pre-1-22
-- File Changes --
D ChangeLog.pre-0-17 (12806) M ChangeLog.pre-1-22 (12807) M Makefile.am (1)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/855.patch https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/855.diff
--- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/855
A cheesy way to improve my diffstats ;-)
--- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/855#issuecomment-169458493
Can't we just delete them? They will still be in git, just go back to 1.26.
On 7 January 2016 at 06:56, Jiří Techet notifications@github.com wrote:
A cheesy way to improve my diffstats ;-)
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/855#issuecomment-169458493.
--- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/855#issuecomment-169495600
@elextr Yeah, maybe. But it could still be useful when looking at some old commit to understand what it does and when the old SVN commit message isn't sufficient (haven't really checked if the old commit messages contain the same info but sometimes even just rephrased description may help).
--- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/855#issuecomment-169812816
@techee if you checkout an old commit the changelogs will come back :)
--- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/855#issuecomment-169814107
@elextr Yeah, but if there's still some possibility it could be useful, I think we shouldn't hide it this way.
What about "rm -rf *"ing everything in the geany directory, committing it and saying "just checkout an older commit to get the Geany code"? ;-)
--- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/855#issuecomment-169817543
myeh, do whatever, its not worth arguing about :)
On 8 January 2016 at 07:52, Jiří Techet notifications@github.com wrote:
@elextr https://github.com/elextr Yeah, but if there's still some possibility it could be useful, I think we shouldn't hide it this way.
What about "rm -rf *"ing everything in the geany directory, committing it and saying "just checkout an older commit to get the Geany code"? ;-)
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/855#issuecomment-169817543.
--- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/855#issuecomment-169822097
Why not, and LGTM
--- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/855#issuecomment-170272925
Merged #855.
--- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/855#event-510272603
(here go your diffstats :))
--- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/855#issuecomment-170279952
github-comments@lists.geany.org