@techee commented on this pull request.
Thumbs up for fixing the only warning that we, ordinary humans with no special compiler options, see during Geany compilation :-).
Looks good but I didn't check if the actual lexer names are correct - but see the related comment in the review.
> @@ -696,23 +696,24 @@ gint sci_get_lexer(ScintillaObject *sci) } -void sci_set_lexer(ScintillaObject *sci, guint lexer_id) +void sci_set_lexer_name(ScintillaObject *sci, const gchar *lexer_name)
This sounds like the function sets the name of the lexer but it just sets it based on the name. Wouldn't it be better to keep it named as before?
> { - g_warning("Failed to find lexer for ID %u", lexer_id); + g_warning("Failed to find lexer for name %s", lexer_name);
I was wondering also in #3616 if it would be possible to do something similar like we do for the TM mappings checks - when starting Geany, going through all the lexers we use and check if we manage to create them; if not, hard-crash with g_error()
.
This would make errors like #3616 impossible. But this depends on two things:
CreateLexer()
shouldn't be too expensive to call, I haven't checked what exactly it does.highlighting.c
and we probably don't want to add one more. So we'd have to create a table containing all the lexers, possibly in a similar way like in filetypes.c
. As a side-effect one could then maybe avoid the warning from #2398 (which is produced by clang by default).Thoughts?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.