Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Maybe I should add a few extra lines to that test with some of the new corner cases I'm now capturing, like the case with = in a comment.
Certainly more is always better, in case someone else breaks it at some point :-)
As per the level of support for regular expressions, I see no other ctags parser using tagRegexTable, so I'm not sure it's supported. (But even if it is, I'm not sure it's a good idea to use it only for Matlab.)
Yeah, as per the comment in #3170 there are no others, and there is a common apprehension that regex parsers are slow, so having them run between keystrokes is an issue.
I notice that other tests have a much more complex .tags file which seems to include an argument list,
You are running up against the limits of my knowledge of ctags/tagmangler (the expert referred to previously is NOT me) but IIUC the arglist is a separate field on the tag, its not part of the tag name (for the reasons you made this PR). Not sure how that is added, maybe look at a parser that does it?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.