whilst the exact text (referring to 1.0) is wrong, the general sentiment still applies

I don’t actually get that from the current text. It says “can change when necessary” and doesn’t say “...but we prefer not to”. That’s probably why it mentions 1.0. Like, “we’re not 1.0 yet so why not break things”.

What I meant was it still might break (an ABI change) occasionally and the API will change regularly as stuff is added, even though we are well beyond 1.0.

Probably would be better to make something out of the explanation I gave above, I don't think its actually been spelled out anywhere to date.

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.