Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Looks like this clang version tries and be clever and wants &str[has_bom ? 3 : 0] rather than pointer arithmetic str + (has_bom ? 3 : 0). I'll prepare a PR, although it's kind of a silly warning, we're not writing C++ 😕
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.