I see that the filebrowser code falls back to a plain text icon, would that be the reason? Does the HTML files in filebrowser have a plain text icon?

Otherwise the code seems fairly similar, although filebrowser is probably simpler and better off without manually loading the icons. If there's no strong reason to do it manually in treebrowser it could make sense to simplify the code and let GTK actually render the GIcon, which is not only simpler but also handles live theme changes and whatnot.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.