Having had a look at #3049 I get the point. But IIUC it must only be merged after #3049 is, otherwise it'll make things rather worse as the current ctags file parser don't understand that field (it could be made to, but I guess it's not the point :))
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.