Weird, I thought this was already merged so didn't comment, since I got a commit mail about it. I guess it's because the branch was made on the main repo instead of a fork?

Anyway, if we do this, committer or merger should delete the branch after so we don't have too many useless branches clogging up the Githubs.

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.