Am 11.02.2016 um 19:45 schrieb Colomban Wendling:
>
> I believe there are a lot of transfer annotations that aren't needed,
> and in most case natural to the reader. In such case, I guess I'd
> rather leave them out.
>
>
@b4n Which ones? I only added them where needed, that is basically all
non-const returns of struct pointers (otherwise g-ir-scanner throws
warnings like this:
> Geany: editor_create_widget: return value: Invalid non-constant
return of bare structure or union; register as boxed type or (skip)
The only superflous annotation was for stash_group_new(). I dropped
that. However, IMO the transfer annotations are very valuable for the
html/pdf docs to and probably shouldn't be dropped either way.
@codebrainz The updated patch set incorporates your changes.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.