Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Oh, or do you mean how it works in universal-ctags?
Yes
There the unit tests work differently and preserve the name of the tested file so the output is always the same.
Ok, I thought there were other languages that required modules to be in files of the same name, but maybe ctags doesn't parse modules for those.
with our unit tests the source file name is a temporary name
Where does that happen? AFAICT runner.sh doesn't copy the source file, it just puts the tagfile in a temporary directory?
Or do you mean that by convention our test file names are chosen to reflect the test purpose (hence your choice of simple.ml for the first test file)? If so thats just a convention, and if it clashes with the language requirements it can be changed and your test file called modulefoo.ml.
Personally I would have disabled the tests not the parsing.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.