Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
That's something that will unfortunately never work with ctags and will have to wait for LSP (aka the post-ctags time consumer if I or someone else is brave enough).
Yeah, that would make Geany into a "full fat" IDE, not sure we want that. But inference is why I moved my C++ work to one. I guess (presuming "somebody" offers to do it) that is a decision that will be needed some day as more languages use inference, but not now.
The question is what we want - whether icons corresponding to groups or icons corresponding to tag types like in the symbol tree - see #3176. I suggest to try the sorting only first and see how it behaves.
I thought I saw something about icons recently!!! Yeah, its not this PR, sorting for a start.
For now I'll just keep it as it is - it didn't work before, it won't work now - and can be improved later.
Agreed, as I said "not this PR".
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.