@b4n commented on this pull request.

Mostly LGBI


In src/geanyobject.h:

> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ typedef enum
 	GCB_PROJECT_OPEN,
 	GCB_PROJECT_SAVE,
 	GCB_PROJECT_CLOSE,
+	GDB_PROJECT_BEFORE_CLOSE,

Yeah, and this enum isn't in the API either.


In src/geanyobject.c:

> @@ -156,6 +156,12 @@ static void create_signals(GObjectClass *g_object_class)
 		G_SIGNAL_RUN_FIRST,
 		0, NULL, NULL, g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID,
 		G_TYPE_NONE, 0);
+	geany_object_signals[GDB_PROJECT_BEFORE_CLOSE] = g_signal_new (
+		"project-before-close",
+		G_OBJECT_CLASS_TYPE (g_object_class),
+		G_SIGNAL_RUN_FIRST,
+		0, NULL, NULL, g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID,
+		G_TYPE_NONE, 0);

Wouldn't it be better if the signal received the GeanyProject as argument?
OK, it'd be inconsistent with the other project signals, so maybe it's a bad idea. Or maybe it's a good idea to break one less thing in the future if we want to allow more than one project to be open? That might not make much sense because the other signals would have to be changed anyway, so meh.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.