You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
@techee commented on this pull request.
> @@ -20,5 +20,5 @@ obj qar�64�Struct.Union�0�int quxx�64�Struct.Union�0�bool test.simple�256�0 -tfun�16�(T)�Class�0�auto +tfun�16�(T v)�Class�0�auto
This doesn't seem to be a valid D code (or valid code for any function-like declaration from c.c). The way signature collection works now it probably replaces the original signature "T" with the second signature "T v" when the second "(" appears. I could probably adjust the signature collection code but not sure if it's worth it as this shouldn't happen in a valid code.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.