Hum, I just noticed that #2140 has been merged in the current release window, so we don't have a released version with the setting, which makes me less worried about backward compatibility. The question whether there are "legitimate" use cases where the proposed adaptive version is not enough and requires a setting still stands, but I'm less worried as well, as there would be an alternative proposal that could still be improved upon.

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.