@b4n I've just repushed a hybrid version of the patch - using the trust_file_scope name but using g_str_has_suffix() as I used in the original patch which I like a bit better (but I don't insist on that one too much if the other version is preferred).

Now the hard stuff - someone has to decide whether to merge this PR or #3457. I would lean towards merging this PR and if we start receiving bug reports related to this issue, we can revert to #3457.


Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: <geany/geany/pull/3490/c1548605756@github.com>