add support for C++ scoping of class members in member functions where this is implicit

Mmm, what? Isn't it what I did, that is that it considers the current scope when there's nothing on the left? My second commit doesn't try to handle this.foo() (which would be nice, but few languages use this), but foo() inside a scope.
The idea being that if it's inside Foo::bar, it has to be part of one of the scopes Foo::bar, Foo, or none; but e.g. not Baz, as it wouldn't be accessible without an explicit prefix (unless inherited somehow, but we don't have that yet anywhere).

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.