@@ -3813,3 +3813,14 @@ void document_grab_focus(GeanyDocument *doc)
gtk_widget_grab_focus(GTK_WIDGET(doc->editor->sci)); }
+static void *copy_(void *src) { return src; } +static void free_(void *doc) { }
+/** Gets the GType of GeanyDocument
- @return the GeanyDocument type */
<rant> What makes you all think my plugin doesn't want a stable gir interface? It seems to me that there's a notion "let's make it @gironly so we can change it any time", just because these symbols aren't immediately useful for c plugins.
This is not what I wanted. I wanted the gir exposed api to be just a different representation of the original plugin api (baring bugs), with the same stability consideration.
My peasy plugin is depending on the gir in the same way as C API. But you seem to treat it differently, as something that can be broken without consideration. </rant>
But if that's how it's acceptable for you, so be it. Can add @gironly to this too.
--- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1038/files/eb3a1a6edf796e71bcd688a1f0e68...