Not sure is really an issue or a wanted behaviour. Anyway, for snippet doesn't include the "int" type declaration

Current snippet:
for=for (i = 0; i < %cursor%; i++)%block_cursor%

Expected snippet:
for=for (int i = 0; i < %cursor%; i++)%block_cursor%

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.