You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
- and if it did, the return_ifs can shortcut return and leave it uninitialised.
@elextr got a point, it's actually technically correct to say the value may not be initialized because of those checks, and it seem impossible for a tool to infer that those checks will succeed, even if we know they will -- unless something else went terribly bad and we're fubar.
So although I initially blamed that on cppcheck, I guess it's fair and this PR makes sense.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.