Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Also I kind of assumed with the code that all the includes are uniquely named and don't do anything special about the duplicates. The first found header with the given name "wins".
I think this assumption easily breaks down on larger (maybe proprietary) code bases. Perhaps we can improve by looking for common tags (tags for function declarations must match with the source file in question right?) but not necessarily in this PR.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.