@@ -3250,6 +3250,7 @@ void scintilla_release_resources(void) { static void *copy_(void *src) { return src; } static void free_(void *doc) { }
+GEANY_API_SYMBOL GType scnotification_get_type(void) { static gsize type_id = 0;
Anyway the discussion out of scope for this PRCode review is out of scope for this PR? At the least it could do like the code @b4n https://github.com/b4n linked to, and avoid ugly (and useless) casts.
Yes, reviewing *this* code is out of scope for *this* PR. The code you question is not changed in this PR and is already part Geany.
This PR just adds the GEANY_API_SYMBOL decoration and the implementation is irrelevant to the PR.
--- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1038/files/6b5a47d05f575b321ff1580444208...