You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
@techee commented on this pull request.
> @@ -290,12 +289,12 @@ static kindOption CKinds [] = {
{ true, 'g', "enum", "enumeration names"},
{ true, 'm', "member", "class, struct, and union members"},
{ true, 'n', "namespace", "namespaces"},
- { false, 'p', "prototype", "function prototypes"},
+ { true, 'p', "prototype", "function prototypes"},
The thing is that the "enabled" field was completely ignored by ctags in Geany and everything was enabled.
Now thinking about it we should probably keep doing that - for a library it's more logical to get all tags and let the code decide what to do with them. Also if we migrate to the cpp parser, we'd have to introduce diffs like that there too.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.