Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
This is hopefully the last of the big TM-related refactorings from me to improve ctags parser management. I'll be nice afterwards, I promise :-).
Thats what you said last time, and the time before and ... :-P
But we are not grateful to you for shouldering that load.
The principles (as much as I understand them from the description) seem sound, but I'm not sure anyone but @b4n could review it, if he remembers any Geany now. Unless someone else wants to become a tagmanager expert to assist @techee.
If it doesn't get reviewed in a reasonable time but it seems to work for anyone testing it, I would suggest that it be merged and the next release be 1.99 (ie pre-2.0, so 2.0 can be stable, that would allow any other "too complex to review in detail" but "test ok for the things testers try" changes to be merged as well).
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.