It's not even clear to me if this is even a bug (as in "not working as intended"). I surely never used that pref.

I hardly can imagine this could be intended behaviour. After start, the previous code opened the tabs in some random (maybe not really random but in some for the user undeterministic order) and after a second start the previous order was restored, on the third start the pseudo random order of the first start is used and so on.
At least me would be very confused by this. I don't mind much if this is a new issue or already present in 1.38, since we have a fix already and it is rather trivial, I'm still for merging.

—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.