@eht16 we need to be careful what we add.

Whilst we want to encourage more complete pull requests, since we don't have surplus effort to do things ourselves more contributor effort is always appreciated, but we should not make it look like contributors must to do all these other things or that the pull request will be rejected if they are not done.

Also some of those really only apply to code changes, not to documents or configurations etc.

Since pull request contributors are more invested we can afford to make the pull request template a little more extensive than issue/feature requests, but it should be presented in a way that it is clear that it can be ignored if the contributor can't do it, or doesn't think its relevant.

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.