@b4n commented on this pull request.

In src/search.c:

> @@ -641,27 +643,27 @@ static void create_replace_dialog(void)
 	label_replace = gtk_label_new_with_mnemonic(_("Replace wit_h:"));
 	gtk_misc_set_alignment(GTK_MISC(label_replace), 0, 0.5);
 
-	entry_find = gtk_combo_box_text_new_with_entry();
-	ui_entry_add_clear_icon(GTK_ENTRY(gtk_bin_get_child(GTK_BIN(entry_find))));
-	gtk_label_set_mnemonic_widget(GTK_LABEL(label_find), entry_find);
-	gtk_entry_set_width_chars(GTK_ENTRY(gtk_bin_get_child(GTK_BIN(entry_find))), 50);
-	ui_hookup_widget(replace_dlg.dialog, entry_find, "entry_find");
-	replace_dlg.find_entry = gtk_bin_get_child(GTK_BIN(entry_find));
+	replace_dlg.find_combobox = gtk_combo_box_text_new_with_entry();
+	replace_dlg.find_entry = gtk_bin_get_child(GTK_BIN(replace_dlg.find_combobox));

@codebrainz as you found out yourself in the docs, it's documented to work. And yeah, having a dedicated accessor would seem better, but well.

Wouldn't that change the CSS, which is part of the published API?

@elextr Bah, they changed a lot of CSS stuff in 3.20, so I guess their answer is that it's not stable or something.

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.