Ok. Let's go this way. I'll try to prepare PRs for uctags with the two missing features. If/When they are merged, we can sync the Pascal parser.
Cool, I was going to prepare the PR myself - you were too fast :-)
:)
However, I only PR'ed the argument list parsing feature. While preparing tests for the "type" parsing, I noticed the current code is quite buggy and incomplete. It only parses very easy type declarations but it probably fails for real world uses. For example: ```pascal type TTest=class procedure Test1; procedure Test2; procedure Test3; end; ``` Will create a tag for "TTest" but also for the procedures "Test2" and "Test3" which are wrong. And "Test1" is missing for some reason (fun fact: even our test case expects that broken behavior in https://github.com/geany/geany/blob/master/tests/ctags/bug612019.pas.tags).
I guess the parsing of "type" declarations needs to implemented in a more sophisticated way. At least I don't want to submit it upstream in the current state. Since I don't want and can't fix the implementation, we maybe should just remove that particular feature instead of keeping an incomplete implementation.