Late on my part, but just to support @elextr's point: don't worry about Geany for extending parsers. We definitely don't want slowing down uctags development, and as mentioned we already have what's needed to detect what needs be updated when pulling a new uctags version.

The API tlib should really care about is the part that allows selecting a parser and calling it, e.g. the C API Geany can use; what each parser reports does not really matter but for how useful it is. I guess the breaking of the tlib test case just happens because we gotta check something to see if all is well, not really because we require this output.

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.