This is nice for when the application / the system is crashing, or there is a power outage.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/905
Would it be possible to have an option either in the preferences or in the build menu to execute the lint command periodically ?
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/1032
```
template <typename T> using Uptr = std::unique_ptr<T>;
```
Does not recognise Uptr as a typename;
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/975
For a verilog file, the variables list parses the old (1995) style verilog module declarations. Verilog 2001 enhanced the syntax and seems to confuse Geany....
1995 syntax:
module (foo, bar, buz);
input foo; // foo port
output bar; // bar port
output buz; // buz port
reg buz; // buz variable
2001 syntax:
module (
input wire foo, // foo port is a wire
output wire bar, // bar port is a wire
output reg buz // buz port is a variable
);
// note: the "wire" is optional and the ports could have been declared with or without
Geany variables list seems to get confused by the 2001 style. It seems to parse the wire keyword as the variable name if I keep the optional "wire" keyword:
If I omit the "wire" keyword, Geany still gets confused, but in a different way. It seems to parse every other variable and then parse the "input" or "output" keywords as variables in some cases:
If someone who knows the code base can even point me to the module(s) doing the parsing for the variables, I may be able to help create the fix/enhancement for this. I'd be happy to try anyway. I am not familiar with the Geany code base so just getting started seems like an insurmountable task.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/670
I am looking for some kind of "Console View" like it is available for example in Eclipse.
Currently a terminal / shell opens when executing a script in Geany. In this shell one can see the process streams stdout and stderr and can write to stdin of the new process.
However, I would rather eliminate this new terminal window popping up and changing focus each time I launch a script in Geany.
I think it is better to have the process communication (stdout, stdin, stderr) embedded in a view within Geany like it is done in many IDEs. The different streams could be colored e.g. stderr in red and stdin (input from the user) in green.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/675
Please add the support for the swift language auto completion functionality .
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/1078
It would be convenient to append items "copy filename" and "copy filepath" on tabs right click menu
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/868
This change makes the main window show immediately after launching Geany
so it's immediately visible Geany started. With big files/projects this
gives users better feedback about it's starting than not showing anything
until all the files are ready.
This is a separated patch suggested by @codebrainz in https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/576. It might be a bit risky for Geany 1.27 because plugins might make some assumptions when geany-startup-complete is called so this one might need some more testing. Possible candidate for early 1.28 merge.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/924
-- Commit Summary --
* Open files session files after entering main loop
-- File Changes --
M src/libmain.c (59)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/924.patchhttps://github.com/geany/geany/pull/924.diff
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/924
After using Geany for almost a day using the Solarized Dark theme, I felt that the text in Geany was slightly harder to read than in Notepad++, an editor I've been using for the past couple years. At first I thought I was imagining things, but after taking screenshots from each editor and comparing them side-by-side with a magnifying glass, I finally figured out why: the font rendering in Geany is ever so slightly darker (or thinner?) than the font rendering in other code editors like Notepad++. Here is the comparison:
Notepad++ is on top and Geany is on the bottom. It is barely noticeable in the image above, but if you zoom in and use the eyedropper tool you will find that the colors in Geany are darker than the ones in Notepad++:
Maybe I'm just more sensitive to this than others, but after spending a day editing code containing lots of strings using the Solarized Dark theme, I find that the code in Geany is slightly harder to read.
I'm not sure how to categorize this because I suspect it is related to the native font rendering engine that is used in Geany.
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/1066