For a verilog file, the variables list parses the old (1995) style verilog module declarations. Verilog 2001 enhanced the syntax and seems to confuse Geany....
1995 syntax:
module (foo, bar, buz);
input foo; // foo port
output bar; // bar port
output buz; // buz port
reg buz; // buz variable
2001 syntax:
module (
input wire foo, // foo port is a wire
output wire bar, // bar port is a wire
output reg buz // buz port is a variable
);
// note: the "wire" is optional and the ports could have been declared with or without
Geany variables list seems to get confused by the 2001 style. It seems to parse the wire keyword as the variable name if I keep the optional "wire" keyword:
![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/14856598/10121213/521dc426-64af-11e5-8c40-bc47d504da8d.png)
If I omit the "wire" keyword, Geany still gets confused, but in a different way. It seems to parse every other variable and then parse the "input" or "output" keywords as variables in some cases:
![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/14856598/10121233/11c50b7c-64b0-11e5-9680-b3421e7c5bea.png)
If someone who knows the code base can even point me to the module(s) doing the parsing for the variables, I may be able to help create the fix/enhancement for this. I'd be happy to try anyway. I am not familiar with the Geany code base so just getting started seems like an insurmountable task.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/670
@techee would you be opposed to this if I were to make a pull request? I remember you said before you never implemented it because you wanted to keep the plugin simple [citation needed], but if I were able to make a simple enough patch that used GFileMonitor to watch the top directory, would be OK with it?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany-plugins/issues/332
I represent your attention AutoIt support, it result [Issues #967](https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/967)
P.S. au3.tags ready.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1017
-- Commit Summary --
* Add AutoIt syntax highlighting
-- File Changes --
M data/Makefile.am (3)
A data/filedefs/filetypes.autoit (98)
M data/filetype_extensions.conf (1)
M scintilla/Makefile.am (1)
A scintilla/lexers/LexAU3.cxx (910)
M scintilla/scintilla_changes.patch (4)
M scintilla/src/Catalogue.cxx (1)
M src/filetypes.c (1)
M src/filetypes.h (1)
M src/highlighting.c (9)
M src/highlightingmappings.h (35)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1017.patchhttps://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1017.diff
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1017
Underline color for warnings should differ from color of errors, for example color of erros is red, color of warnings is orange Currently it's red for both
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/864
Hi,
is there any chance to add Lexer for [AutoIt3 scripting language](https://www.autoitscript.com/site/autoit/) to Geany? I am ready to help with a _filetypes.au3_ and _au3.tags_.
Regards,
P.S. _LexAU3.cxx_ in the source of Scintilla is old (Jul 26, 2007), but it works (as well as au3.properties).
[There is a new version](https://bitbucket.org/scite-ru/scite-ru.bitbucket.org/src/53d62fc5… (Sep 05, 2013). I tried to compile SciTE 3.6.4 with new version: it's works on Windows XP SP3 (MinGW), but there are some weird problems with ends commentblock on Xubuntu 14.04. I seem to find the problem and wrote the author.
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/967
Is it also possible to change the color scheme in symbols (left) and compilers (down of the page) window?
How could i do this?
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/1006
Hi,
I wanted to try running geany from source,
so an `autogen.sh` and `make` later I've got it.
I run `src/geany`, skipping `make install` since I don't want to install it,
it gives me the error Failed to open file '/usr/local/share/geany/geany.glade'.
I look around and find no option or environment variable to change the data directory, (something like `-c`)
The two options I found were:
* `mkdir build && ./configure --prefix=$(pwd)/build && make && make install`
* changing in https://github.com/geany/geany/blob/master/src/utils.c#L2142 `GEANY_DATADIR` to `""`
neither are good.
Is there something to do to use a source version of geany that doesn't requires modifying the source code or installing it after each make?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/788
This is a follow up to #397. Check, whether the fix suggested inside PR is needed or some other solution needs to be there
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany-plugins/issues/398