This is a tracking bug where we are with universal-ctags syncing regarding individual parsers. After https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1160 gets in, the work on merging the parsers can start.
If someone wants to merge some of the parsers, it would be best to drop a line here so people don't do the same work in parallel.
Below is the state of individual parsers -> shows the general direction of from where to where the changes should be brought. <-> means changes will probably be necessary in both Geany and uctags parsers.
**basically merged**
- [ ] asm
- [ ] cobol
- [ ] css
- [ ] erlang
- [ ] json
- [ ] objc
**waiting for varType in uctags**, see https://github.com/universal-ctags/ctags/issues/862 (simple to merge)
- [ ] go (Geany->uctags)
- [ ] rust (Geany->uctags)
**normal diffs**
- [ ] basic (uctags->Geany)
- [ ] diff (uctags->Geany)
- [ ] fortran (uctags<->Geany)
- [ ] html (Geany->uctags)
- [ ] jscript (uctags<->Geany)
- [ ] lua (uctags->Geany)
- [ ] make (uctags->Geany)
- [ ] pascal (Geany->uctags)
- [ ] perl (uctags->Geany)
- [ ] php (uctags<->Geany)
- [ ] ruby (uctags->Geany)
- [ ] sql (uctags->Geany)
- [ ] tcl (Geany->uctags)
**big diffs**
- [ ] python (uctags->Geany)
- [ ] r (uctags<->Geany)
- [ ] sh (uctags->Geany)
- [ ] verilog (uctags->Geany)
**unmergable diffs**
- [ ] latex (uctags) vs tex (Geany) - different parsers - haven't checked what they do and if they should be treated as a parser of a single language or not
- [ ] matlab (we have regex-based parser, uctags has hand-written one - we should probably grab the uctags one)
- [ ] VHDL (different parsers from different people - uctags parser contains more LOCs so it's probably better :-)
- [ ] c.c (meh)
**extra parsers in Geany**
abaqus, abc, actionscript, asciidoc, conf, docbook, haskell, haxe, markdown, nsis, powershell, rest, txt2tags
**extra parsers in uctags**
ada, ant, asp, awk, beta, clojure, dbusintrospect, dosbatch, dts, eiffel, falcon, flex, glade, jprop, lisp, maven2, myrddin, ocaml, perl6, plist, protobuf, relaxng, rex, rpmspec, rst, scheme, slang, sml, svg, ttcn, vim, windres, xslt, yacc
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/1162
Unfortunately Gtk3 dropped the support for flipping through notebook pages for 'usability reasons' without making it available again with some kind of options. So applications like gnome-terminal started to re-implement this feature.
For maintaining feature parity with the Gtk2 backend, geany should re-implement scrolling through notebook pages as well.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/872
20:49:15: Geany INFO : Geany 1.27 (git >= ad354b7), en_AU.UTF-8
20:49:15: Geany INFO : GTK 3.10.8, GLib 2.40.2
Ignore the commit, Geany Git is actually 27628c0 (I thought we fixed needing to re-configure to get the git version?)
After using Geany for a while sometimes when switching tabs only the line with the flashing caret displays the new file, then after a while some more displays etc.
If I move the cursor into the edit widget it all updates.
Its like Scintilla is not getting the correct triggers to cause full update.
This doesn't happen with all tabs, but the ones edited most.
@b4n any suggestions where to look?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/807
1. Create a file in /tmp
2. Try to do a diff/* for that file
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany-plugins/issues/503
Geany is an excellent tool but gdb support unfortunately does not support cross-debugging, which is a rapidly growing need. I certainly don't want to be forced to use some ugly mastodent like eclipse just for that.
This patch is very short, so it seems that there is little functionality missing to achieve this. Would it be possible to integrate something like this into geany-plugins?
http://faumarz.blogspot.fr/2014/03/gdb-and-geany-ide-remote-cross-debugging…
Thanks.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany-plugins/issues/303
In Geany the name `instance` is highlighted as a type
```C++
class c {
int i;
public:
c( int j ):i(j){}
int f(){ return i; }
} instance{1};
c another{1};
```
Note github has it correct.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/892
Hi,
At the moment Linux users are essentially left to wait until their respective distribution's repositories are updated and the new release of Geany is added. This process is so tedious, however, that for most non-bleeding edge distributions one has to wait months or years for this to happen (by which time usually an even newer release of Geany is out). So what I propose is that you's provide your own AppImages for Geany. AppImages, for those of you that are unaware, are a type of cross-distribution packaging format that need no special tools (like no special package manager to manage the packages) in order to be run. They merely need to be marked executable (with `chmod +x`) and run (with `./<AppImage>` where `<AppImage>` is the AppImage's filename, including its file extension). They are essentially self-mounting image files with an internal file system that contains all the files required to run the program they provide (which in this case would be Geany, of course).
I have created my own AppImage for Geany (which you can find [here](https://bintray.com/fusion809/AppImages/Geany#files)) but as you might notice it is presently out of date (version 1.28, versus the latest release of 1.29) as the Debian packages (and no this does not mean that this AppImage will only run on Debian systems, it will run on Arch Linux, Fedora, Gentoo, openSUSE, etc. as well) I built it from are presently out-of-date (although no doubt they will be updated soon). Plus my AppImage is built using Debian (Jessie) ingredients so it doesn't work on systems older than Jessie, while it is possible that you's could create a more flexible AppImage. You's could use your Travis CI artefacts instead of the Debian packages I use to build the AppImage, hence providing the very latest (more up-to-date than I could ever hope to provide) build of Geany. The way I uploaded my Geany AppImage to Bintray is using Travis CI, so they both easily integrated with one another. Alternatively you could upload the AppImages to the releases page of this GitHub repository.
If you need help with this I am more than willing to help, although I do believe @probonopd will be far more helpful than I, due to his superior knowledge of AppImages (after all he is the one that created the format).
Thanks for your time,
Brenton
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/1303
Geany 1.28 Release (Windows and Linux) and Geany 1.29 and I think also Geany 1.27 and before
Lines that start with ';' are syntax highlighted as comment.
Lines that start with '#' are syntax highlighted as comment.
An entry "key=value" in a line starting with ';' is shown in the symbols list.
An entry "key=value" in a line starting with '#' is not shown in the symbols list.
I attached a small test file test.ini, but I had to rename it to test.ini.txt because github refused to upload test.ini
[test.ini.txt](https://github.com/geany/geany/files/464268/test.ini.txt)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/1220
```C++
namespace ns {
class C {
void f( // when typing the ( the calltip says "ns::C::f (junk, rubbish)"
public:
C(junk, rubbish){}
~C(){}
};
};
```
Yep, takes the parameters for the constructor and it uses that as the prototype for the new function that doesn't exist yet.
And ... if there happen to be other functions named `f` the calltips will cycle through the prototypes of those functions and never come back to the erroneous one.
Seems like some extraneous function definition is being made for the calltip. But it never appears in the symbol list. Like as if something is scanning for the ) and using the parameter list immediately before it, ignoring the `public: C(`. But what, its not the parser because the symbol doesn't show in the sidebar?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/1249
geany version - 1.29
Most of the function declarations in glibc header files are marked with __THROW.
Geany cannot identify or incorrectly identifies these functions.
(sample files /usr/include/pthread.h, /usr/include/unistd.h).
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/issues/1314