> Last and least, pull request #191 and SF patch #11 are earlier thanHmmm... I wrote to the mailing list about them, answering to "shan chak
> > #226. If one of them is applied, #226 will be seriously broken.
> >
>
> I had no idea about these PRs. Thanks for pointing this out. I will check
> them.
<shankholove@gmail.com>", though that's not identical to your account.
As the author of SF patch #11, I plan to extend it for warnings, using
code from PR #226, except for the parsing. But I don't have time now.