sorry to be spamy here but i saw that the special keywords, mod and mod dispatch style was also commented, was cus it was breaking the build? i have to discuss this to the scintilla devs then when i can, so i know for sure the right tokens to be styled.
ups forgot the patch here it comes.On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Mário Silva <sharelider@gmail.com> wrote:
i understand but i dunno where to summit the changes to the scintilla project, and your commit broken the compile cus some constants and some names are different, im already trying to apply to the group mailing list, please so it doest get broken, consider apply this patch to fix it, and when i can i summit to the scintilla.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Nick Treleaven <nick.treleaven@btinternet.com> wrote:On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 19:10:53 +0100
> hi there again, version is scintilla 221, the changes i did afaik to the lexI've committed the patch but with a version of LexLisp.cxx from
> was only push some constants to the SciLexer.h as you can see in the patch,
> and change the keywords & keywords_kw local variables to a more apropriate
> names, the rest is the same, so is not a big deal.
Scintilla. Please consider sending your changes to the Scintilla
project.
filetype_extensions.conf was already in the patch ;-)
> oh i forgot to send this file.
Regards,
Nick
_______________________________________________
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel