On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:23:32 +0100, Colomban wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Nick Treleaven a écrit :
>> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:29:48 +0100
>> Colomban Wendling <
lists.ban@herbesfolles.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Here's a small patch that adds support for lambdas in the Python
>>> tagmanager. What it does it report Python's lambdas as functions
>>> (with arguments) rather than as variables. Nested lambda are
>>> supported too.
>>
>> I haven't tried it but do we really want this? Aren't lambda
>> functions supposed to be short and limited to local scope? We don't
>> parse other local things other than nested functions, but they can
>> be quite long.
>
>I don't know if lambda are "supposed" to be local, but I personally
>tend to use them for most of very small functions, regardless they are
>local or not. But don't trust me for Python's "good practices".
I'd say if ever lamda's are used as some kind of anonymous functions or