On 10/05/2013 05:12 PM, Lex Trotman wrote:



On 6 October 2013 01:25, Tory Gaurnier <tory.gaurnier@linuxmail.org> wrote:
Just thought I'd give everyone an update, it's still coming along, I have the tree view in the symbol list working as expected (it was easier than I thought, I was overcomplicating it at first), right now I'm working on cleaning up my code, and optimizing certain things.

I would be done by now if I wasn't working so much, but I should have QML support finished within the next few days (if I have the time I'll get it finished tonight). Then I'll be ready to submit my work to ctags, and Geany.

One thing you could do to assist is to make a test suite for the tag parser, see the preliminary ones Colomban has been adding.  Another thing is to see if you can get others to use and comment on the filetype.  There is some reluctance to commit new filetypes for languages that the Geany devs don't know, because of the effort required to learn the language to tell if the colouring and symbology make sense.  Having more than one user of the filetype makes it more likely that it will be "just accepted".

Cheers
Lex

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.geany.org
https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel



_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.geany.org
https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

Not sure what you mean by test suite, I've uploaded it to github ( https://github.com/tgaurnier/geany/), and would love for people to test it, it seems to be fairly bug free now, there's things I still want to fix, but when using correct QML syntax it seems to be pretty flawless now (at least from the testing I've done).

Could you maybe shoot me a link of one of the test suites from Colomban you're refering to?