Uh oh, fighting...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RybNI0KB1bg
Can't we all just:
;-)
On 10/13/2014 10:45 AM, Dimitar Zhekov
wrote:
On
12.10.2014 г. 19:04, Tim Tassonis wrote:
On 10/11/2014 12:12 PM, Dimitar Zhekov
wrote:
On 22.9.2014 г. 18:34, Kernc wrote:
If I'm going to distro-hop, why
not Windows? A working desktop, if
nothing else.
Have fun, then. Just fixed a few Windows Machines and again knew
one
reason to never, ever move to windows: The real-life requirement
to
install a third-party commercial virus scanner eating up half of
my
computer's resources just to be able to survive a few days on
this
platform. Never in my life will i move to that horrible world.
Very true. I never praised Win~1 in the first place, and the lack
of package manager is it's main system fault until W8. It'll take
many years to see all applications migrate to Windows Store, and
to have running random code from Internet blocked forever.
With the Linux distributions, the situation quite different, but
not any better. You can (a) use the distribution packages only,
and put up with things like K4, G3 and systemd; (b) compile
packages from source, which is time consuming, and due to
dependencies, you need to compile more and more of them; (c) block
the unwanted updates - but again, due to dependencies, you have to
block more and more. For a regular user, the only choice is (a),
or install once and never update anything. Linux praises itself as
a "free" operating system, but I can hardly imagine more
totalitarian installation approach.
I used mainly distribution packages, of course, with some things
compiled, some blocked, and even a 3rd party .deb or two, but
managing the whole thing became too time consuming. As much as I
hate them, the antivirus scanners at least work automatically.
--
E-gards: Jimmy
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.geany.org
https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel