2008/11/11 Enrico Tröger <enrico.troeger@uvena.de>
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:00:09 +0000, Nick Treleaven
<nick.treleaven@btinternet.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:02:48 +1100
>"Lex Trotman" <elextr@gmail.com> wrote:

>Thanks, but I don't like the existing code being reformatted with
>different alignment really. What are the options you used?

Attached the config file, the only setting that seems to touch things you don't want is indent_func_call_param which is true/false selecting indent one level or indent to open parens.  Quite frankly I found the indent one level awful so I picked open parens.  There seems no way of turning it off which is what we want.
 


Additionally, I can't really understand your(Lex) troubles with the
indentation at all. It's pretty simple: we use tabs with a tab width of
4 characters. This is IMO the most simplest form of indentation at all.
I never had the need of using an external code formatter for this type
(for writing new code).

The indentation problem only existed because the first version committed had mixed indentation, I am not sure but maybe it was a 0.14 problem with the setting, since I installed 0.15 everything is coming up tabs.  Hopefully this is fixed.

My real reason for suggesting a formatter was not for indentation but for other areas of the code eg spaces around ()s other operators etc.  I was simply trying to ensure that my code matched your expectations taking into account that the format is different to what I use most of the time, and being human I am going to get it wrong sometimes, no matter how often I re-read it.  Using a formatter was a way of fixing that, but unfortunately they all seemed to have side effects.  The one I suggested simply had the least.

Cheers
Lex


Regards,
Enrico

--
Get my GPG key from http://www.uvena.de/pub.asc

_______________________________________________
Geany-devel mailing list
Geany-devel@uvena.de
http://lists.uvena.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geany-devel