[Github-comments] [geany/geany] Improve handling of anonymous tags (PR #3059)

[Jiří Techet]

> Points 3 and 4 sound useful so long as the kind1 is right.

This in fact is the ctags 'kind' but it should be the kind as ordinary humans understand it. For instance, when you check the cxx parser here in the 3rd column, it is what you would expect to see:

https://github.com/geany/geany/blob/5ea3e3ec77eaa87ff709f003743dbb80285e3b6f/ctags/parsers/cxx/cxx_tag.c#L42

> Point 5 would be a good improvement, the disconnect between the struct and the typedef was annoying. What happens with this if a declaration that has both the struct name and the typedef?

Both will be kept. This pull request addresses just the anonymous tags and in this case the struct isn't anonymous.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3059#issuecomment-998026359
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <geany/geany/pull/3059/c998026359 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.geany.org/pipermail/github-comments/attachments/20211220/7db88b01/attachment.htm>